To help students learn how to generate operational
definitions of hypothetical constructs, Dr. Steven Specht (e-mail: sspecht@utica.edu) created an
in-class exercise he calls
“Bucket o’ constructs.” In the exercise, students work
in pairs. Each pair grabs a slip of paper from a container (Steven calls his
container “Bucket o’ constructs”). Each slip has the name of
construct on it (Steven uses constructs such as "helpful," "nice," "shy," "angry," and
"intelligence"). Each pair of students must generate a measure of their construct that is (a)
behavioral (self-report and
physiological measures are not allowed), (b) objectively measurable, and (c) quantifiable. Students are usually
able to generate quantifiable definitions by choosing either frequency (number
of) measures or duration measures. However, students often have to refine their
definition to remove aspects that are not objectively measurable. After each
pair presents their operational definition, the rest of the class
guesses what construct the pair is trying to measure. The incorrect guesses can lead to discussions of (a) the
need to use dictionaries and the thesaurus that accompanies Psychological
Abstracts to know precisely what it is that the researcher
wants to measure and what the researcher does not (as Steven points out, “nice,”
“kind,” and “polite” are different constructs) and (b)
the need for discriminant validity.
Reference
Specht, S. M. (2004, October). “Bucket
o’ constructs”: Introduction to operational definitions and
technical writing.
Poster session presented at the Finding out: Best practices in
teaching research
methods and psychology in psychology conference, Atlanta, GA.