[qdeck]
[q] abstract
[a] one paragraph summary of an article that appears at the beginning of an article
[q] introduction
[a] explains why the hypothesis should be tested
[q] method
[a] describes what was done in the study
[q] results
[a]tells whether the data support the hypothesis
[q] discussion
[a] interprets the results and explains their importance
[q] direct replication
[a] exact copy of a study
[q] power
[a] ability to a study to detect a relationship between variables
[q] conceptual replication
[a] variation on a study that improves the construct validity
[q] systematic replication
[a] minor variation of a study, sometimes done to improve power or external validity
[q] one paragraph summary of an article that appears at the beginning of an article [textentry]
[c] abstract
[a] Yes, the abstract is at the beginning of the article and briefly summarizes the study's key elements.
[c]*
[a] Sorry, the correct answer is Abstract.
[q] explains why the hypothesis should be tested [textentry]
[c] introduction
[a] Yes, you were right. The introduction tells us what the hypothesis is, why it makes sense, and why it should be tested.
[c]*
[a] No, the correct answer is the introduction.
[q] describes what was done in the study[textentry]
[c] method
[a] Right! The method section is the "how we did it" section.
[c]*
[a] No, the method section tells us about the "nuts and bolts" of the study.
[q]tells whether the data support the hypothesis [textentry]
[c] results
[a] Good job. The results section deals with figuring out whether the results support the hypothesis.
[c]*
[a] No, the results section is where we learn whether the results support the hypothesis.
[q] interprets the results and explains their importance[textentry]
[c] discussion
[a] Yes, in the discussion section, the authors discuss the study and explain the value of their study.
[c] results
[a] No, the results section tells you whether the results fit with the hypothesis. The discussion section gives the big picture.
[c]*
[a] Sorry, the correct answer is the discussion section.
[q] exact copy of a study[textentry]
[c] direct replication; exact replication
[a] Yes, it is a direct replication, which is also sometimes called an exact replication
[c]*
[a] direct replication is the term we were looking for.
[q] ability to a study to detect a relationship between variables[textentry]
[c] power
[a] Yes, researchers hope their study has the power to find differences.
[c]*
[a] The right answer is power
[q] variation on a study that improves the construct validity[textentry]
[c] conceptual replication
[a] Well done! The conceptual replication is the most sophisticated kind of replication.
[c]*
[a] You should have said conceptual replication
[q] minor variation of a study, sometimes done to improve power or external validity[textentry]
[c] systematic replication
[a] Yes, in the systematic replication, the researcher may make one systematic change to the study, such as studying a different type of participant.
[c]*
[a] No, the correct answer is systematic replication
[q] any type of study that repeats another study [textentry]
[c] replication
[a] Right! As the name suggests, replications try to replicate (repeat) other studies to some degree.
[c]*
[a] Sorry, the correct answer is replication
[/qdeck]